Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 03:10
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
How can I effectively remove vocals from a song without affecting the music quality?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The Best Of Roots Picnic Made Up For The Absolute Worst - HuffPost
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Can AI replace architects and interior designers?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
If You Fit Into One Of These 6 Categories, You Should Be Taking Creatine - MindBodyGreen
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.